Farm tourism – for or against?

Timo Uustal

Every tourist can find something of interest in Estonia. In Tallinn, as well as in other Estonian cities, there is a wealth of medieval architecture. The lover of pristine nature may enjoy hiking, canoe trips, hunting and fishing. In addition there is farm tourism, which enables one to experience true country living. The surrounding sea with its multitude of islands is perfect for boating. For those athletically inclined there are golf courses, tennis courts and riding stables, etc.

Tourism can generate many benefits, such as employment and income, as well as infrastructure improvement. In some countries, tourism can be important as it may provide a way to maintain a level of economic activity sufficient to prevent migration of people from underdeveloped regions to more developed areas. The development of tourism means that hotels, game parks and even golf courses have to be built. To do this, good farmland is often built on, meaning a loss of land that could have been supplying the economy with agricultural money. That problem can be avoided by using farm tourism instead of classical tourism.

Problems in rural tourism development in Estonia: no organisation at state level, there are too many ministries concerning rural tourism, no working message to market, different understanding about rural development and rural tourism development, lack of classification system, lack of systemised training and lack of state support.

Not only can tourism cause economic problems, but also environmental problems. These can be in the sea, air or land, but all can lead to impacts on both the locals in the tourist industry, as the thing people once came to visit is destroyed. These can cause a decrease in the number of visitors and therefore the amount of money coming into the economy.

Deforestation can cause stress on the land, especially with the help of trampling for footpaths. Thus, soil erosion can occur causing destruction of other vegetation and even buildings in severe cases. These tend to occur where the tourism is unplanned and unmanaged, trampling can still occur if there are no footpaths and this can stunt or even kill plant growth. This also causes the destruction of habitats and so affecting the local population of wildlife.

Tourism can be beneficial to an economy, but it depends on the type of tourism. The ideal tourism needs to aim for the maximisation of economic benefits for the local community, whilst also working for a minimisation of socio-cultural nuisances. Tourism can essentially just be an international exchange of people, who bring with them their own social preferences and prejudices, which often means an inter-cultural conflict. The only positive path that tourism can take is through sustainable tourism, like farm tourism, which tries to maintain all the attractive qualities of a site, including its environment, character and economic qualities. If this can be established, then the benefits can outweigh the problems tourism can bring, but if not, then development is far away.